Cash and Matthew 7:5 (Senate 19)

Wesley Meredith’s negative campaigning against challenger Kirk deViere is beyond ripe with hypocrisy.  In case you don’t live in the 19th District or don’t have a mailbox, TV or radio, here are the two major attacks Meredith has volleyed at deViere:

Attack 1:  DeViere is a “deadbeat” who didn’t pay his taxes.

Hypocrisy:  Meredith didn’t pay his taxes in 1993 and lied about it recently when questioned by a Fayetteville radio program.  When faced with the truth, he had this to say:

“It was a quarter century ago, I’d forgotten about it,” he said. “I went back and checked. It was paid off in under a year.”

DeViere also paid off the taxes his business owed, but that doesn’t matter to a hypocrite, so a hypocrite keeps calling his opponent a “tax deadbeat” in glossy ads.

Attack 2:  DeViere’s business was sued because he stiffed someone out of some money.

Hypocrisy:  In a story the News and Observer broke last night, it came to light that Meredith’s business was sued in 2015 because he hired someone with habitual DWI’s and no license and let him drive his company’s vehicle.  Like clockwork, Meredith’s employee drove drunk and severely hurt someone.  The lawsuit alleged Meredith let his employee sleep and drink alcohol on company property.  Meredith’s response?  There was none:

“The N&O could not reach Meredith despite attempts to reach him by phone, email and through the Republican Party. The N&O first emailed Meredith on Oct. 8”

Meredith’s pretty good at not taking questions from reporters about his past, and we’ve come to expect it.  In the end, when you have hundreds of thousands of more dollars than your opponent, you don’t have to answer for yourself because you can buy a bigger microphone, amplifier, or air-horn to drown-out and destroy the other guy.  You can even spend enough to cover the plank in your own eye.     

 

This one’s free.

 

Gender Gap Narrows In Cumberland Early Vote; Party Trends Look Stable

With several days of early voting under our belt and a higher-than-expected turnout, we have enough raw data to draw some preliminary conclusions about the 2018 electorate in Cumberland County.

Women are Under-Performing

I’ve written at length about a predicted surge in female voters this election.  I appear to be dead wrong after several days of early voting as the opposite has happened, at least in Cumberland County.  Here’s the breakdown:

4

Here’s the same figures in a bar-chart:

3

In 2016, with a female on the presidential ballot for the first time, women took a massive share of the vote in Cumberland County:  56.11%.  Men didn’t come close with 39.99%, and the result was was a 16-point gender gap.

This year, the vote is closer than it’s been in the past three major elections with men making a 5 point jump to 45.3% of the vote.  With women at 51.99%, the gap has closed to 6.7 points.  It will be interesting to see if this trend holds.  Needless to say, I’m surprised.  This will definitely affect local races.  Read this link as to how that might work.

Party Vote Seems Stable

Here’s a breakdown of the recent historical vote by party in Cumberland County:

2

And a line graph of the same numbers:

1

As you can tell, party voting has remained relatively stable over the past three elections.  While Democrats are enjoying a slight edge in the 2018 early vote, that is to be expected.  Democrats like early voting, especially on weekends.  If anything, I would expect Democrats to be doing better than they are in the 2018 early vote.  The current figures suggest that Republican voters in Cumberland County are rallying around their Commander in Chief with more enthusiasm than anyone predicted.  Perhaps the Kavanaugh nomination battle got men agitated.  We’ll see if this holds as election day nears.

Wrap-Up

Enthusiasm seems high across the board in Cumberland County.  Party trends are stable, and men are doing better than expected.

On that note, I received my first ad from Wesley Meredith yesterday.  All the others (pink glitter and what not) have been addressed to my wife.  This one argued that Kirk DeViere wanted to take away my right to hunt and fish because he was against one of the proposed constitutional amendments.  I assume the ad was targeted toward men.  Looking at early vote out of Cumberland, it’s not a bad strategy for Meredith to target guys as we don’t seem to be going down without a fight this year.

By the way, like DeViere, I’m against all of the amendments.  Still, I’ll probably go fishing this weekend.  Certain rights are inalienable.

Richardson0079 (002)

That’s my grandma on the New Bern waterfront as a young lady.  I wonder who she’d vote for.

 

 

Cumberland Election Preview – Women in 2018

We’re a month out.  The effects of Hurricane Florence are finally wearing off, the Kavanaugh fight is over, and people are beginning to pay attention to the midterm election.  Once sparse yard signs are clogging intersections.  The TV ads have started.  It’s time to do some Cumberland County prognosticating.

justice

It’s well known that this election will be about Trump.  Most midterms are a referendum on the sitting president.  I’ve argued that his influence will trickle all the way down to to local races.   As it stands today, more than twice as many women disapprove of Trump than approve of him.  Men on the other hand seem to be sticking by him.  We’re left with a gender divide that may be the largest in modern American politics.

Women are fired up and for good reason.  On cue, more women are running for office than ever before.   But I think that this gender divide runs deeper than party.  Women want women in power.  They’re tired of the old, predominantly male class of folks running everything As a result, I’m predicting cross-over votes by women, for women in this election.   This will be a dangerous election for any incumbent male with a female challenger.  Will any men be left standing?  Of course, but many won’t.

Two local races that might test this theory are the Tal Baggett – Caitlin Young Evans race for District Court Judge and the Billy Richardson – Linda Devore race for NC House (44).  If Evans can win over Democratic and Republican women in her race, she has a good shot to unseat a long-sitting judge.  If Devore can poach Democratic women voters, she could pull an upset in a Democratic leaning district.  Expect both incumbent men to hit on kitchen table issues to woo women voters.  This will come in the form of ads regarding DWI’s/Public Safety/Domestic Violence for Baggett and Education/Teacher Pay/Water Quality for Richardson.

If you need some graphic proof of my theory, look at Kirk Deviere’s current Facebook logo:

deviere

It’s not hard to guess the target audience.  Deviere knows the key to taking down Wesley Meredith in 2018 is women.  Meredith knows this too and is undercutting Deviere by running negative ads featuring a female voice that mocks Deviere’s wardrobe.

Lady Justice will determine how the scales tip this election.   I think it’s time.

 


 

Note:  Billy Richardson (NC House 44) is my father.  I do my best to avoid commenting on his races, but in this case it was unavoidable.  

 

Festival “Park”???

I’ve been very critical of the plans for the new parking deck in downtown Fayetteville that we will not be allowed to use for baseball games and community events.  I won’t re-hash those same arguments.  The bun is in the oven on the deal, and we will be able to hold our elected leaders accountable for its success or failure.

A preliminary report is in from the “parking expert” the City Council hired out of Indianapolis to assess the situation.  Unsurprisingly, the consultant still needs more time to finish his evaluation.  It’s only been five months, after all, so he’s still on the clock.  The final report is coming later.

In the meantime, he says we’ll be fine for games, but we’ll have parking problems during larger events.   He suggests we conduct a marketing campaign and add automated signs and smartphone apps that will tell people where to park.  He also recommends that we adjust our paid parking regulations (charge more money).

The future for downtown parking seems obvious:  less supply + greater demand = paid parking for everyone that can afford it.  We’ve made a commodity out of our downtown public space.  It’s no longer ours, it’s the City’s, and we’ll pay to use it.

A SIMPLE IDEA

I have complained enough.  Here’s a solution that may help:

We don’t need a marketing campaign or smartphone app to get us out of a problem of our own making.  We need more parking spaces next to the stadium, preferably free spaces.  This will encourage more Fayetteville families to attend more games.

On the left is an overhead shot of Festival Park which is adjacent to the new stadium.  On the right is a photo-shopped image of the courthouse with its parking lot covering Festival Park.  This gives you a sense of scale (Festival Park is roughly the size of the courthouse and its back parking lot).

Here’s a crude mock-up from my Iphone of what I could see working:

IMG_5358

I’m not suggesting we pave over festival park.  The point is that the grassy lawn could hold several hundred vehicles within a 5 minute walk of the stadium.  Restrooms are already present for families to use.  Food trucks and vendors could even line the Linear Park walkway to catch people on the way to the game.  If the grass gets damaged, I’m sure Methodist College’s Turf Management students could assist us in keeping up the field for concerts and other events.

In the end, this is just an idea and one of many that will be needed to get around this problem.  I just wish we could park in our 15 million dollar deck, right frigging next to the stadium.

Feel free to share your thoughts.  Maybe our parking consultant from Indianapolis is listening.

Reverse Engineering – Downtown Parking Continued

Early this Spring, this website brought to light the details behind the new parking deck being built next to our baseball stadium in downtown Fayetteville.  Most importantly, I broke the news that the public would not get to use any of the spaces.  Rather, the spaces in our deck were contractually reserved for Prince Charles Holdings, LLC, our new “business partners.”  In short, Fayetteville is paying 15 million dollars for a parking deck its citizens cannot use so that rich investors will build a hotel in downtown Fayetteville.

The news caused a stir.  City Manager Doug Hewitt went on the radio and criticized my findings.  Other interested parties came out of the woodwork in defense of the deal, but they couldn’t kill the story.  The Fayetteville Observer got in the mix and began asking questions.

A few weeks later, in response, the mayor and the city council did what any smart municipal government does when it can’t answer hard questions and needs to buy time:  order a study!

Yes, we’ve hired some “parking professional” to spend our tax dollars to tell us that when you take away 800 parking spaces from a growing downtown and increase demand by building a stadium, your citizens might not have a place to park.  The “big reveal” of the results of the study is Monday night.

Can’t wait.